You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automated home-cage behavioural phenotyping of mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms1064 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hueihan Jhuang, Estibaliz Garrote, Xinlin Yu, Vinita Khilnani, Tomaso Poggio, Andrew D. Steele, Thomas Serre |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 275 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 27% |
| Researcher | 55 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 56 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 38 | 12% |
| Engineering | 23 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,451,423
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#26,048
of 46,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,618
of 95,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#15
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.