Title |
Boswellic acid acetate induces apoptosis through caspase-mediated pathways in myeloid leukemia cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, March 2005
|
DOI | 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-03-0266 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lijuan Xia, Duo Chen, Rui Han, Qicheng Fang, Samuel Waxman, Yongkui Jing |
Abstract |
The mechanism of the cytotoxic effect of boswellic acid acetate, a 1:1 mixture of alpha-boswellic acid acetate and beta-boswellic acid acetate, isolated from Boswellia carterri Birdw on myeloid leukemia cells was investigated in six human myeloid leukemia cell lines (NB4, SKNO-1, K562, U937, ML-1, and HL-60 cells). Morphologic and DNA fragmentation assays indicated that the cytotoxic effect of boswellic acid acetate was mediated by induction of apoptosis. More than 50% of the cells underwent apoptosis after treatment with 20 mug/mL boswellic acid for 24 hours. This apoptotic process was p53 independent. The levels of apoptosis-related proteins Bcl-2, Bax, and Bcl-XL were not modulated by boswellic acid acetate. Boswellic acid acetate induced Bid cleavage and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential without production of hydrogen peroxide. A general caspase inhibitor (Z-VAD-FMK) and a specific caspase-8 inhibitor II (Z-IETD-FMK) blocked boswellic acid acetate-induced apoptosis. The mRNAs of death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5) were induced in leukemia cells undergoing apoptosis after boswellic acid acetate treatment. These data taken together suggest that boswellic acid acetate induces myeloid leukemia cell apoptosis through activation of caspase-8 by induced expression of DR4 and DR5, and that the activated caspase-8 either directly activates caspase-3 by cleavage or indirectly by cleaving Bid, which in turn decreases mitochondria membrane potential. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 26 | 43% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
Canada | 3 | 5% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 51 | 84% |
Scientists | 5 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 42% |