You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modelling malaria treatment practices in Bangladesh using spatial statistics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-11-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ubydul Haque, Lauren M Scott, Masahiro Hashizume, Emily Fisher, Rashidul Haque, Taro Yamamoto, Gregory E Glass |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,468
of 5,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,976
of 156,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#28
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.