↓ Skip to main content

Comparative efficacy of two poeciliid fish in indoor cement tanks against chikungunya vector Aedes aegyptiin villages in Karnataka, India

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative efficacy of two poeciliid fish in indoor cement tanks against chikungunya vector Aedes aegyptiin villages in Karnataka, India
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanta K Ghosh, Preethi Chakaravarthy, Sandhya R Panch, Pushpalatha Krishnappa, Satyanarayan Tiwari, Vijay P Ojha, Manjushree R, Aditya P Dash

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,949
of 14,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,517
of 120,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#105
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.