↓ Skip to main content

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: an open randomized, non-inferiority, trial

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus chloroquine to treat vivax malaria in Afghanistan: an open randomized, non-inferiority, trial
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-9-105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ghulam Rahim Awab, Sasithon Pukrittayakamee, Mallika Imwong, Arjen M Dondorp, Charles J Woodrow, Sue Jean Lee, Nicholas PJ Day, Pratap Singhasivanon, Nicholas J White, Faizullah Kaker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Burkina Faso 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 90 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Other 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,477,697
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,870
of 5,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,174
of 95,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.