↓ Skip to main content

Gabapentin for acute and chronic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gabapentin for acute and chronic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005452.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip J Wiffen, Henry J McQuay, Jayne Edwards, R Andrew Moore

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 109 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Other 11 9%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 48%
Unspecified 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 14 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,453,652
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,298
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,974
of 270,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.