You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of autologous blood transfusion on the use of pack of red blood cells in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.5935/1678-9741.20130027 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leonardo Leiria de Moura da Silva, Anna Júlia de Borba Andres, Roberta Senger, Ralf Stuermer, Maria de Mello de Celoni Godoy, Eduardo Francisco Mafassioli Correa, Virgínia Maria Cóser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#30
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,248
of 209,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them