You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002834.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Everett, Andrew Bryant, Michelle F Griffin, Pierre PL Martin‐Hirsch, Carol A Forbes, Ruth G Jepson |
| Abstract |
World-wide, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women. Increasing the uptake of screening, alongside increasing informed choice is of great importance in controlling this disease through prevention and early detection. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 398 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 84 | 21% |
| Researcher | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 17% |
| Unknown | 93 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Psychology | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 110 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,815,678
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,475
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,021
of 124,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.