↓ Skip to main content

Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002834.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Everett, Andrew Bryant, Michelle F Griffin, Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch, Carol A Forbes, Ruth G Jepson

Abstract

World-wide, cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women. Increasing the uptake of screening, alongside increasing informed choice is of great importance in controlling this disease through prevention and early detection.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 287 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 15%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 66 22%
Unknown 29 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Psychology 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 5%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 48 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,634,637
of 13,845,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,287
of 10,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,082
of 246,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,845,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.