↓ Skip to main content

Sources of Unreliability in Depression Ratings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sources of Unreliability in Depression Ratings
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, February 2009
DOI 10.1097/jcp.0b013e318192e4d7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth A. Kobak, Brianne Brown, Ian Sharp, Hollie Levy-Mack, Kurrie Wells, Felice Ockun, Janet B.W. Williams

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Norway 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 40%
Other 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
#872
of 3,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,119
of 186,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.