↓ Skip to main content

When incentives work too well: locally implemented pay for performance (P4P) and adverse sanctions towards home birth in Tanzania - a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When incentives work too well: locally implemented pay for performance (P4P) and adverse sanctions towards home birth in Tanzania - a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Chimhutu, Ida Lindkvist, Siri Lange

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 23%
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 23 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 24%
Social Sciences 41 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 30 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,253,943
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,913
of 8,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,482
of 321,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#23
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.