↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture for (sub)acute non-specific low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acupuncture for (sub)acute non-specific low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009265
Authors

Andrea D Furlan, Fatemeh Yazdi, Alexander Tsertsvadze, Lixing Lao, Karen Sherman, Carlo Ammendolia, Ellen Wang, Byung-Cheul Shin, Ikuro Wakayama, Maurits W van Tulder

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Other 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 51%
Unspecified 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Psychology 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 12 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,639,773
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,022
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,827
of 264,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.