↓ Skip to main content

The McKenzie method for chronic non-specific low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The McKenzie method for chronic non-specific low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009712
Authors

Luciana Machado, Maurits W van Tulder, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Helen Clare, Jill A. Hayden

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Researcher 8 13%
Unspecified 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 52%
Unspecified 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,639,772
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,057
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,827
of 264,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.