↓ Skip to main content

The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The association between proximity to animal-feeding operations and community health: a protocol for updating a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-3-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette M O’Connor, Brent W Auvermann, Julian PT Higgins, Shelley P Kirychuk, Jan M Sargeant, Susanna G Von Essen, Julie M Glanville, Hannah Wood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Master 10 16%
Other 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,530,253
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,315
of 2,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,628
of 239,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.