↓ Skip to main content

Combining demographic and genetic factors to assess population vulnerability in stream species

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining demographic and genetic factors to assess population vulnerability in stream species
Published in
Ecological Applications, September 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-0499.1
Authors

E. L. Landguth, C. C. Muhlfeld, R. S. Waples, L. Jones, W. H. Lowe, D. Whited, J. Lucotch, H. Neville, G. Luikart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 3%
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 96 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 25%
Student > Master 16 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 54%
Environmental Science 22 21%
Unspecified 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 13 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,344,365
of 21,358,901 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,509
of 3,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,139
of 287,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,358,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.