You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Innate immunity and monocyte-macrophage activation in atherosclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inflammation, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-9255-8-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Shalhoub, Mika A Falck-Hansen, Alun H Davies, Claudia Monaco |
| Abstract |
Innate inflammation is a hallmark of both experimental and human atherosclerosis. The predominant innate immune cell in the atherosclerotic plaque is the monocyte-macrophage. The behaviour of this cell type within the plaque is heterogeneous and depends on the recruitment of diverse monocyte subsets. Furthermore, the plaque microenvironment offers polarisation and activation signals which impact on phenotype. Microenvironmental signals are sensed through pattern recognition receptors, including toll-like and NOD-like receptors - the latter of which are components of the inflammasome - thus dictating macrophage behaviour and outcome in atherosclerosis. Recently cholesterol crystals and modified lipoproteins have been recognised as able to directly engage these pattern recognition receptors. The convergent role of such pathways in terms of macrophage activation is discussed in this review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 227 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 22% |
| Researcher | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 25% |
| Unknown | 24 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 39% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 33 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation
#278
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,130
of 121,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.