↓ Skip to main content

Testing the grass‐fire cycle: alien grass invasion in the tropical savannas of northern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity & Distributions, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
302 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing the grass‐fire cycle: alien grass invasion in the tropical savannas of northern Australia
Published in
Diversity & Distributions, April 2003
DOI 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2003.00020.x
Authors

Natalie A. Rossiter, Samantha A. Setterfield, Michael M. Douglas, Lindsay B. Hutley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Australia 4 1%
Brazil 4 1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 251 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 19%
Researcher 50 19%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 54 20%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 36%
Environmental Science 91 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 4%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 50 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,158,211
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#192
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,068
of 61,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them