↓ Skip to main content

Budget constraint and vaccine dosing: a mathematical modelling exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Budget constraint and vaccine dosing: a mathematical modelling exercise
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-12-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baudouin A Standaert, Desmond Curran, Maarten J Postma

Abstract

Increasing the number of vaccine doses may potentially improve overall efficacy. Decision-makers need information about choosing the most efficient dose schedule to maximise the total health gain of a population when operating under a constrained budget. The objective of this study is to identify the most efficient vaccine dosing schedule within a fixed vaccination budget from a healthcare payer perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 30%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Other 10 25%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,600,874
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#306
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,560
of 320,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.