You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Budget constraint and vaccine dosing: a mathematical modelling exercise
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-12-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Baudouin A Standaert, Desmond Curran, Maarten J Postma |
Abstract |
Increasing the number of vaccine doses may potentially improve overall efficacy. Decision-makers need information about choosing the most efficient dose schedule to maximise the total health gain of a population when operating under a constrained budget. The objective of this study is to identify the most efficient vaccine dosing schedule within a fixed vaccination budget from a healthcare payer perspective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 17% |
Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 30% |
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 25% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,600,874
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#306
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,560
of 320,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.