You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
User and researcher collaborations in mental health in low and middle income countries: a case study of the EMPOWER project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esha Gupta, Bayard Roberts |
| Abstract |
Increasing recognition has been given to the interaction of users and researchers in shaping the perspective and practice of mental health care. However, there remains very little evidence exploring how this interaction works, particularly in low and middle income countries. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of how users and researchers worked together to communicate research, using a case study of the EMPOWER project. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| South Africa | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Librarian | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 23% |
| Psychology | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,049,457
of 25,078,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,253
of 4,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,629
of 320,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#41
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,078,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.