You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Frictional properties of incoming pelagic sediments at the Japan Trench: implications for large slip at a shallow plate boundary during the 2011 Tohoku earthquake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1880-5981-66-65 |
| Authors |
Michiyo Sawai, Takehiro Hirose, Jun Kameda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 85% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#451
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,659
of 240,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#16
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.