You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004178.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sharath Chandra Vikram Paravastu, Rubaraj Jayarajasingam, Rachel Cottam, Simon J Palfreyman, Jonathan A Michaels, Steven M Thomas |
Abstract |
An abnormal dilatation of the abdominal aorta is referred to as an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Due to the risk of rupture, surgical repair is offered electively to individuals with aneurysms greater than 5.5 cm in size. Traditionally, conventional open surgical repair (OSR) was considered the first choice approach. However, over the past two decades endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has gained popularity as a treatment option. This article intends to review the role of EVAR in the management of elective AAA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 345 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 14% |
Student > Master | 44 | 13% |
Researcher | 43 | 12% |
Other | 30 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 8% |
Other | 67 | 19% |
Unknown | 90 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 175 | 50% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 3% |
Engineering | 7 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
Other | 30 | 9% |
Unknown | 101 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,864,660
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,970
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,750
of 322,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.