↓ Skip to main content

Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
41 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002783.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Watson L, Broderick C, Armon MP, Watson, Lorna, Broderick, Cathryn, Armon, Matthew P

Abstract

Standard treatment for deep vein thrombosis aims to reduce immediate complications. Use of thrombolysis or clot dissolving drugs could reduce the long-term complications of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) (pain, swelling, skin discolouration, or venous ulceration) in the affected leg. This is the second update of a review first published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Other 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 12%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#497,927
of 13,611,214 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,510
of 10,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,262
of 245,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,611,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.