↓ Skip to main content

A atenção em saúde mental aos adolescentes em conflito com a lei no Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A atenção em saúde mental aos adolescentes em conflito com a lei no Brasil
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, May 2017
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232017225.33562016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilson do Rosário Costa, Paulo Roberto Fagundes da Silva

Abstract

This paper analyzes the use of psychoactive drugs by juvenile offenders in Brazil in socio-educational facilities (USEs). It describes the guidelines of the national public policy and the quality of mental healthcare coordination by subnational public governments. This work draws on the hypothesis that USEs vertical governance is associated with the use of psychoactive medication. This is comparative study of two cases in Rio Grande do Sul and Minas Gerais. Data resulted from a sample of medical records and interviews with key informants. The paper shows that vertical governance observed in Rio Grande do Sul is directly associated with high prevalence of mental health disorder diagnosis, use of psychoactive medication and psychiatric medicalization by juvenile offenders deprived of liberty. These findings indicate that sanctions of imprisonment for illegal acts are producing a set of medicalization decisions that undermine juveniles' health rights. The national mental health policy guidelines encourage cautious decisions. Psychotherapies and rehabilitation actions are the advocated first-line interventions. The poor management of the psychopharmacological intervention favors multiple prescriptions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 26%
Student > Master 6 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 7 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,885,814
of 16,110,448 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#141
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,130
of 272,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,110,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.