↓ Skip to main content

Fidelity vs. simplicity

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fidelity vs. simplicity
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925946
Authors

Jean-Dominique Favreau, Florent Lafarge, Adrien Bousseau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 34 68%
Engineering 6 12%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Unknown 8 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#9,169,645
of 14,574,801 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1,517
of 1,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,710
of 267,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,574,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.