↓ Skip to main content

Insulin for glycaemic control in acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Insulin for glycaemic control in acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005346.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Fernanda Bellolio, Rachel M Gilmore, Latha Ganti

Abstract

People with hyperglycaemia concomitant with an acute stroke have greater mortality, stroke severity, and functional impairment when compared with those with normoglycaemia at stroke presentation. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2011.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 136 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 25 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,085,072
of 14,162,573 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,049
of 10,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,523
of 248,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,162,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,869 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.