↓ Skip to main content

Biological, socio-demographic, work and lifestyle determinants of sitting in young adult women: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological, socio-demographic, work and lifestyle determinants of sitting in young adult women: a prospective cohort study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Léonie Uijtdewilligen, Jos WR Twisk, Amika S Singh, Mai JM Chinapaw, Willem van Mechelen, Wendy J Brown

Abstract

Sitting is associated with health risks. Factors that influence sitting are however not well understood. The aim was to examine the biological, socio-demographic, work-related and lifestyle determinants of sitting time (including during transport, work and leisure) in young adult Australian women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 11%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 40 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Sports and Recreations 14 9%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Psychology 12 8%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 56 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,455,852
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,255
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,563
of 306,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#28
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.