↓ Skip to main content

Addition to inhaled corticosteroids of long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes for chronic asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addition to inhaled corticosteroids of long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes for chronic asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003137.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Francine M Ducharme

Abstract

Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) represent a management challenge. Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) and anti-leukotrienes (LTRA) are two treatment options that could be considered as add-on therapy to ICS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 211 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Other 18 8%
Other 55 25%
Unknown 31 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 40 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2018.
All research outputs
#864,300
of 15,875,387 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,391
of 11,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,974
of 256,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,875,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.