↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of response patterns in different survey designs: a longitudinal panel with mixed-mode and online-only design

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of response patterns in different survey designs: a longitudinal panel with mixed-mode and online-only design
Published in
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12982-017-0058-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Rübsamen, Manas K. Akmatov, Stefanie Castell, André Karch, Rafael T. Mikolajczyk

Abstract

Increasing availability of the Internet allows using only online data collection for more epidemiological studies. We compare response patterns in a population-based health survey using two survey designs: mixed-mode (choice between paper-and-pencil and online questionnaires) and online-only design (without choice). We used data from a longitudinal panel, the Hygiene and Behaviour Infectious Diseases Study (HaBIDS), conducted in 2014/2015 in four regions in Lower Saxony, Germany. Individuals were recruited using address-based probability sampling. In two regions, individuals could choose between paper-and-pencil and online questionnaires. In the other two regions, individuals were offered online-only participation. We compared sociodemographic characteristics of respondents who filled in all panel questionnaires between the mixed-mode group (n = 1110) and the online-only group (n = 482). Using 134 items, we performed multinomial logistic regression to compare responses between survey designs in terms of type (missing, "do not know" or valid response) and ordinal regression to compare responses in terms of content. We applied the false discovery rates (FDR) to control for multiple testing and investigated effects of adjusting for sociodemographic characteristic. For validation of the differential response patterns between mixed-mode and online-only, we compared the response patterns between paper and online mode among the respondents in the mixed-mode group in one region (n = 786). Respondents in the online-only group were older than those in the mixed-mode group, but both groups did not differ regarding sex or education. Type of response did not differ between the online-only and the mixed-mode group. Survey design was associated with different content of response in 18 of the 134 investigated items; which decreased to 11 after adjusting for sociodemographic variables. In the validation within the mixed-mode, only two of those were among the 11 significantly different items. The probability of observing by chance the same two or more significant differences in this setting was 22%. We found similar response patterns in both survey designs with only few items being answered differently, likely attributable to chance. Our study supports the equivalence of the compared survey designs and suggests that, in the studied setting, using online-only design does not cause strong distortion of the results.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Mathematics 6 9%
Psychology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 22 31%