↓ Skip to main content

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy or by surgery and chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy or by surgery and chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS)
Published in
BMC Cancer, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-11-329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johan L Dikken, Johanna W van Sandick, HA Maurits Swellengrebel, Pehr A Lind, Hein Putter, Edwin PM Jansen, Henk Boot, Nicole CT van Grieken, Cornelis JH van de Velde, Marcel Verheij, Annemieke Cats

Abstract

Radical surgery is the cornerstone in the treatment of resectable gastric cancer. The Intergroup 0116 and MAGIC trials have shown benefit of postoperative chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy, respectively. Since these trials cannot be compared directly, both regimens are evaluated prospectively in the CRITICS trial. This study aims to obtain an improved overall survival for patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery by incorporating radiotherapy concurrently with chemotherapy postoperatively.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Other 16 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 20 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2011.
All research outputs
#1,786,745
of 4,505,992 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#615
of 2,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,972
of 58,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#23
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 58th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,430 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.