↓ Skip to main content

Cyanobacteria of the 2016 Lake Okeechobee and Okeechobee Waterway harmful algal bloom

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cyanobacteria of the 2016 Lake Okeechobee and Okeechobee Waterway harmful algal bloom
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/ofr20171054
Authors

Rosen, Barry H., Davis, Timothy W., Gobler, Christopher J., Kramer, Benjamin J., Loftin, Keith A., Barry H. Rosen, Timothy W. Davis, Christopher J. Gobler, Benjamin J. Kramer, Keith A. Loftin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 30%
Unspecified 2 20%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#662,665
of 12,342,935 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#92
of 1,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,420
of 269,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#16
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.