↓ Skip to main content

Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010108.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Guay, Peter Choi, Santhanam Suresh, Natalie Albert, Sandra Kopp, Nathan Leon Pace

Abstract

Various beneficial effects derived from neuraxial blocks have been reported. However, it is unclear whether these effects have an influence on perioperative mortality and major pulmonary/cardiovascular complications.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 214 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Unspecified 26 12%
Other 25 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Other 86 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 67%
Unspecified 40 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 11 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,517,318
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,068
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,909
of 238,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.