↓ Skip to main content

Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010108.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Guay, Peter Choi, Santhanam Suresh, Natalie Albert, Sandra Kopp, Nathan Leon Pace

Abstract

Various beneficial effects derived from neuraxial blocks have been reported. However, it is unclear whether these effects have an influence on perioperative mortality and major pulmonary/cardiovascular complications.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 266 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 18%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Researcher 28 10%
Other 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 9%
Other 78 28%
Unknown 35 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 176 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 55 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,561,151
of 15,549,524 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,255
of 11,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,086
of 255,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,549,524 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.