↓ Skip to main content

Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010108.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Guay, Peter Choi, Santhanam Suresh, Natalie Albert, Sandra Kopp, Nathan Leon Pace

Abstract

Various beneficial effects derived from neuraxial blocks have been reported. However, it is unclear whether these effects have an influence on perioperative mortality and major pulmonary/cardiovascular complications.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 347 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 16%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Researcher 34 9%
Other 33 9%
Student > Postgraduate 31 9%
Other 93 26%
Unknown 67 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 207 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 86 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,328,520
of 21,361,101 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,800
of 12,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,127
of 287,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,361,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.