You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Envisioning, Quantifying, and Managing Thermal Regimes on River Networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/bix047 |
| Authors |
E. Ashley Steel, Timothy J. Beechie, Christian E. Torgersen, Aimee H. Fullerton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Austria | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 17% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 69 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#691,508
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#317
of 2,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,042
of 316,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.