You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computed tomography measurement of glenoid vault version as an alternative measuring method for glenoid version
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1749-799x-9-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Noboru Matsumura, Kiyohisa Ogawa, Hiroyasu Ikegami, Philippe Collin, Gilles Walch, Yoshiaki Toyama |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 44% |
| Engineering | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#164
of 1,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,671
of 235,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.