↓ Skip to main content

Anaesthetic regimens for day‐procedure laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anaesthetic regimens for day‐procedure laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009784.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Vaughan, Myura Nagendran, Jacqueline Cooper, Brian R Davidson, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Abstract

Day surgery involves admission of selected patients to hospital for a planned surgical procedure with the patients returning home on the same day. An anaesthetic regimen usually involves a combination of an anxiolytic, an induction agent, a maintenance agent, a method of maintaining the airway (laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation), and a muscle relaxant. The effect of anaesthesia may continue after the completion of surgery and can delay discharge. Various regimens of anaesthesia have been suggested for day-procedure laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 56 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Psychology 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 62 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,576,527
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,096
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,438
of 321,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#209
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.