↓ Skip to main content

Risikofaktoren des postoperativen Deliriums in der Herzchirurgie.

Overview of attention for article published in Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 206)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risikofaktoren des postoperativen Deliriums in der Herzchirurgie.
Published in
Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie, May 2017
DOI 10.1055/s-0043-103084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Gernhardt, Sophie Kluge, Mira Meon, Claudia Schmidtke, Antje Karluß, Beate Sedemund-Adib, Tilman Wetterling, Hans-Hinrich Sievers, Klaus Junghanns

Abstract

Background Delirium is a common psychiatric disorder after cardiac surgery and predisposes patients to increased mortality and morbidity. Its prevention requires knowledge of the risk factors involved. Objective What are preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery? Methods Prospective longitudinal study of 241 elective cardiac surgical patients with preoperative assessment of potential risk factors and delirium assessment twice daily over five postoperative days. Results 13 % of the patients experienced delirium. Reduced cognitive performance (OR: 3.80; 95 % CI: 1.66 - 8.66), higher comorbidity (OR: 1.36; 95 % CI: 1.07 - 1.7) and higher age (OR: 1.08; 95 % CI: 1.02 - 1.13) increased the risk of delirium. Conclusion Delirium after cardiac surgery is common. It occurs in particular in patients with low cognitive performance, higher comorbidity and higher age.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Psychology 3 13%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,217,909
of 13,535,507 outputs
Outputs from Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie
#5
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,387
of 270,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,535,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them