↓ Skip to main content

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005019.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suetonia C Palmer, Sankar D Navaneethan, Jonathan C Craig, Vlado Perkovic, David W Johnson, Sagar U Nigwekar, Jorgen Hegbrant, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Abstract

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher risks of cardiovascular disease compared to the general population. Specifically, cardiovascular deaths account most deaths in kidney transplant recipients. Statins are a potentially beneficial intervention for kidney transplant patients given their established benefits in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 157 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 20%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Other 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 35 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,893,588
of 17,342,898 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,481
of 11,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,235
of 263,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,342,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.