↓ Skip to main content

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005019.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suetonia C Palmer, Sankar D Navaneethan, Jonathan C Craig, Vlado Perkovic, David W Johnson, Sagar U Nigwekar, Jorgen Hegbrant, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Abstract

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher risks of cardiovascular disease compared to the general population. Specifically, cardiovascular deaths account most deaths in kidney transplant recipients. Statins are a potentially beneficial intervention for kidney transplant patients given their established benefits in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Researcher 21 10%
Other 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 58 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 67 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,549,320
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,101
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,656
of 323,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.