↓ Skip to main content

National survey of the surgical management of subfertility associated with uterine fibroids which do not distort the uterine cavity

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecological Surgery, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National survey of the surgical management of subfertility associated with uterine fibroids which do not distort the uterine cavity
Published in
Gynecological Surgery, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10397-008-0446-2
Authors

G Ahmad, J M N Duffy, Y Mohammed, A J S Watson

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,979,185
of 11,251,144 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#46
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,623
of 267,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,251,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them