You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of soil particle erodibility and sediment trapping using check dams in small semi-arid catchments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CATENA, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.catena.2017.05.021 |
| Authors |
Ali Reza Vaezi, Mohammad Abbasi, Saskia Keesstra, Artemi Cerdà |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,552,700
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from CATENA
#981
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,937
of 322,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CATENA
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.