↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic ‘engines’ of flight drive genome size reduction in birds

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic ‘engines’ of flight drive genome size reduction in birds
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, January 2014
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2013.2780
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. A. Wright, T. R. Gregory, C. C. Witt, Natalie A. Wright, T. Ryan Gregory, Christopher C. Witt

Abstract

The tendency for flying organisms to possess small genomes has been interpreted as evidence of natural selection acting on the physical size of the genome. Nonetheless, the flight-genome link and its mechanistic basis have yet to be well established by comparative studies within a volant clade. Is there a particular functional aspect of flight such as brisk metabolism, lift production or maneuverability that impinges on the physical genome? We measured genome sizes, wing dimensions and heart, flight muscle and body masses from a phylogenetically diverse set of bird species. In phylogenetically controlled analyses, we found that genome size was negatively correlated with relative flight muscle size and heart index (i.e. ratio of heart to body mass), but positively correlated with body mass and wing loading. The proportional masses of the flight muscles and heart were the most important parameters explaining variation in genome size in multivariate models. Hence, the metabolic intensity of powered flight appears to have driven genome size reduction in birds.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 10%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 82 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 29%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Other 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 17%
Unspecified 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 7 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2018.
All research outputs
#519,642
of 12,282,412 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,703
of 7,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,895
of 225,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#32
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,282,412 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.