↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosing adult primary brain tumours: can we do better?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosing adult primary brain tumours: can we do better?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, May 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x691277
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clarissa Penfold, Alexis J Joannides, Joyce Bell, Fiona M Walter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Librarian 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Unspecified 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,741,111
of 11,298,449 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,557
of 2,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,720
of 267,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#67
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,298,449 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.