↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of faecal removal methods of pasture management to control the cyathostomin burden of donkeys
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher J Corbett, Sandy Love, Anna Moore, Faith A Burden, Jacqui B Matthews, Matthew J Denwood

Abstract

The level of anthelmintic resistance within some cyathostomin parasite populations has increased to the level where sole reliance on anthelmintic-based control protocols is not possible. Management-based nematode control methods, including removal of faeces from pasture, are widely recommended for use in association with a reduction in anthelmintic use to reduce selection pressure for drug resistance; however, very little work has been performed to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of such methods.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 27%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,375,384
of 12,451,686 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#738
of 3,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,345
of 231,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#36
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,451,686 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.