↓ Skip to main content

Valorization of Dacryodes rostrata fruit through the characterization of its oil

Overview of attention for article published in Food Chemistry, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Valorization of Dacryodes rostrata fruit through the characterization of its oil
Published in
Food Chemistry, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee Hong Tee, Bao Yang, Beng Ti Tey, Eng-Seng Chan, Azrina Azlan, Amin Ismail, Jian Sun, Cheng Yuon Lau, Uma D. Palanisamy, Ramakrishnan Nagasundara Ramanan, Krishnamurthy Nagendra Prasad

Abstract

Dacryodes rostrata (kembayau) is an important food and oil resource for local communities in Borneo, but it is not commonly known to wider community. The objective of this work is to valorize kembayau fruit by evaluating the characteristics of the oil from the fruit. In this study, the physicochemical characteristics and the lipophilic essential nutrient; the fatty acid composition, vitamin E and beta-carotene content of oils obtained from the peel, pulp and seeds of kembayau fruits were studied. The pulp of the kembayau fruit contained highest proportion of oil, followed by peel and seed. Kembayau fruit contained vitamin E and had trace amount of beta-carotene. Besides, kembayau fruit oils were not toxic to BRL3A cells, provided hepatoprotection and reversed lipid peroxidation in paracetamol-induced toxicity. Our results suggest that kembayau can be a potential source for cooking oil as the physicochemical characteristics are comparable with commercial source such as oil palm.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Chemistry 5 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 12 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,552,700
of 22,977,819 outputs
Outputs from Food Chemistry
#6,900
of 10,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,972
of 329,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Chemistry
#99
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,977,819 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,686 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.