↓ Skip to main content

Shifting public values and what they mean for increasing democracy in wildlife management decisions

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 2,201)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
77 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shifting public values and what they mean for increasing democracy in wildlife management decisions
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10531-017-1378-9
Authors

Lily M. van Eeden, Chris R. Dickman, Euan G. Ritchie, Thomas M. Newsome

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 19%
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 27%
Environmental Science 25 24%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 31 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#481,820
of 22,489,683 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#42
of 2,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,839
of 291,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,489,683 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.