↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiology of chronic subdural haematoma: inflammation, angiogenesis and implications for pharmacotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
371 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathophysiology of chronic subdural haematoma: inflammation, angiogenesis and implications for pharmacotherapy
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12974-017-0881-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellie Edlmann, Susan Giorgi-Coll, Peter C. Whitfield, Keri L. H. Carpenter, Peter J. Hutchinson

Abstract

Chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH) is an encapsulated collection of blood and fluid on the surface of the brain. Historically considered a result of head trauma, recent evidence suggests there are more complex processes involved. Trauma may be absent or very minor and does not explain the progressive, chronic course of the condition. This review focuses on several key processes involved in CSDH development: angiogenesis, fibrinolysis and inflammation. The characteristic membrane surrounding the CSDH has been identified as a source of fluid exudation and haemorrhage. Angiogenic stimuli lead to the creation of fragile blood vessels within membrane walls, whilst fibrinolytic processes prevent clot formation resulting in continued haemorrhage. An abundance of inflammatory cells and markers have been identified within the membranes and subdural fluid and are likely to contribute to propagating an inflammatory response which stimulates ongoing membrane growth and fluid accumulation. Currently, the mainstay of treatment for CSDH is surgical drainage, which has associated risks of recurrence requiring repeat surgery. Understanding of the underlying pathophysiological processes has been applied to developing potential drug treatments. Ongoing research is needed to identify if these therapies are successful in controlling the inflammatory and angiogenic disease processes leading to control and resolution of CSDH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 369 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 16%
Other 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 9%
Researcher 28 8%
Student > Master 25 7%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 130 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 39%
Neuroscience 29 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 1%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 151 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,718,427
of 23,874,480 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#168
of 2,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,290
of 318,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,874,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.