↓ Skip to main content

What Moral Distress in Nursing History Could Suggest about the Future of Health Care

Overview of attention for article published in this source, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Moral Distress in Nursing History Could Suggest about the Future of Health Care
Published by
American Medical Association (AMA), June 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.6.mhst1-1706
Pubmed ID
Abstract

The concept of moral distress was defined in 1984 as (a) the psychological distress of (b) being in a situation in which one is constrained from acting (c) on what one knows to be right. A substantial literature on the subject has developed, primarily in nursing ethics. The aforementioned elements of distress are applied here to areas of clinical and organizational significance: (a) distress from causing intimate pain during care of the dying, (b) constraints stemming from proximate and background challenges of health care organizations, and (c) changing perspectives on therapeutic technologies derived from global environmental perspectives. Although moral distress may be increasing in clinical settings, nursing advocates are developing positive ways to cope with it that can help clinicians in general.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Psychology 4 7%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 22%