↓ Skip to main content

New Approaches to Drug Discovery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 19: Sources for Leads: Natural Products and Libraries
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Sources for Leads: Natural Products and Libraries
Chapter number 19
Book title
New Approaches to Drug Discovery
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/164_2015_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-928912-0, 978-3-31-928914-4
Authors

Eric F. van Herwerden, Roderich D. Süssmuth, Herwerden, Eric F. van, Süssmuth, Roderich D.

Abstract

Natural products have traditionally been a major source of leads in the drug discovery process. However, the development of high-throughput screening led to an increased interest in synthetic methods that enabled the rapid construction of large libraries of molecules. This resulted in the termination or downscaling of many natural product research programs, but the chemical libraries did not necessarily produce a larger amount of drug leads. On one hand, this chapter explores the current state of natural product research within the drug discovery process. On the other hand it evaluates the efforts made to increase the amount of leads generated from chemical libraries and considers what role natural products could play here.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 42%