↓ Skip to main content

New Approaches to Drug Discovery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 27: Functional Genomics in Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Functional Genomics in Pharmaceutical Drug Discovery.
Chapter number 27
Book title
New Approaches to Drug Discovery
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/164_2015_27
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-928912-0, 978-3-31-928914-4
Authors

Adams, Robert, Steckel, Michael, Nicke, Barbara, Robert Adams, Michael Steckel, Barbara Nicke

Abstract

Targeted therapies in personalized medicine require the knowledge about the molecular changes within the patient that cause the disease. With the beginning of the new century, a plethora of new technologies became available to detect these changes and use this information as starting point for drug development. Next-generation genome sequencing and sophisticated genome-wide functional genomics' methods have led to a significant increase in the identification of novel drug target candidates and understanding of the relevance of these genomic and molecular changes for the diseases. As functional genomic tool for target identification, high-throughput gene silencing through RNA interference screening has become the established method. RNAi is discussed with its advantages and challenges in this chapter. Furthermore the potential of CRISPR/Cas9, a gene-editing method that has recently been adapted for use as functional screening tool, will be briefly reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 47%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Computer Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,290,425
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#572
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,394
of 267,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.