↓ Skip to main content

New Approaches to Drug Discovery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 23: Using Cheminformatics in Drug Discovery
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Using Cheminformatics in Drug Discovery
Chapter number 23
Book title
New Approaches to Drug Discovery
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/164_2015_23
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-928912-0, 978-3-31-928914-4
Authors

Lawless, Michael S, Waldman, Marvin, Fraczkiewicz, Robert, Clark, Robert D, Michael S. Lawless, Marvin Waldman, Robert Fraczkiewicz, Robert D. Clark, Lawless, Michael S., Clark, Robert D.

Abstract

This chapter illustrates how cheminformatics can be applied to designing novel compounds that are active at the primary target and have good predicted ADMET properties. Examples of various cheminformatics techniques are illustrated in the process of designing inhibitors that inhibit both cyclooxygenase isoforms but are more potent toward COX-2. The first step in the process is to create a knowledge database of cyclooxygenase inhibitors in the public domain. This data was analyzed to find activity cliffs - small structural changes that result in drastic changes in potency. Additional cyclooxygenase potency and selectivity trends were obtained using matched molecular pair analysis. QSAR models were then developed to predict cyclooxygenase potency and selectivity. Next, computational algorithms were used to generate novel scaffolds starting from known cyclooxygenase inhibitors. Nine virtual libraries containing 240 compounds each were constructed. Predictions from the cyclooxygenase QSAR models were used to eliminate molecules with undesirable potency or selectivity. Additionally, the compounds were screened in silico for undesirable ADMET properties, e.g., low solubility, permeability, metabolic stability, or high toxicity, using a liability scoring system known as ADMET Risk™. Eight synthetic candidates were identified from this process after incorporating knowledge gained from activity cliff analysis. Four of the compounds were synthesized and tested to measure their COX-1 and COX-2 IC50 values as well as several ADME properties. The best compound, SLP0020, had a COX-1 IC50 of 770 nM and COX-2 IC50 of 130 nM.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 18%
Chemistry 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,184,793
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#133
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,651
of 266,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them