↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002073.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Devender Roberts, James P Neilson, Mark D Kilby, Simon Gates

Abstract

Twin-twin transfusion syndrome, a condition affecting monochorionic twin pregnancies, is associated with a high risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity. A number of treatments have been introduced to treat the condition but it is unclear which intervention improves maternal and fetal outcome.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 19%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Unspecified 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 22 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2017.
All research outputs
#3,045,462
of 13,378,007 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,657
of 10,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,403
of 245,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,378,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.