↓ Skip to main content

Flood of July 2016 in Northern Wisconsin and the Bad River Reservation

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flood of July 2016 in Northern Wisconsin and the Bad River Reservation
Published in
US Geological Survey, June 2017
DOI 10.3133/sir20175029
Authors

Fitzpatrick, Faith A., Dantoin, Eric D., Tillison, Naomi, Watson, Kara M., Waschbusch, Robert J., Blount, James D.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,689,073
of 11,318,094 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#708
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,455
of 267,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#79
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,318,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.