↓ Skip to main content

Amplification with hearing aids for patients with tinnitus and co-existing hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amplification with hearing aids for patients with tinnitus and co-existing hearing loss
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010151.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek J Hoare, Mark Edmondson-Jones, Magdalena Sereda, Michael A Akeroyd, Deborah Hall

Abstract

Tinnitus is described as the perception of sound or noise in the absence of real acoustic stimulation. In the current absence of a cure for tinnitus, clinical management typically focuses on reducing the effects of co-morbid symptoms such as distress or hearing loss. Hearing loss is commonly co-morbid with tinnitus and so logic implies that amplification of external sounds by hearing aids will reduce perception of the tinnitus sound and the distress associated with it.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 14%
Psychology 13 6%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 51 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,632,844
of 17,355,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,048
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,770
of 263,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,355,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.